Volume 17, Issue 2 (March & April 2026)                   BCN 2026, 17(2): 175-190 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Motaqi M, Moallemi M, Mirani A, Aboutorabi Y, Hatef B. A Comprehensive Review of Imagined Speech Decoding in Brain-computer Interfaces: Utilizing Electroencephalography and Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy. BCN 2026; 17 (2) :175-190
URL: http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3306-en.html
1- Physiotherapy Research Center, School of Rehabilitation, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
3- Biomedical Engineering Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Microbiology, Ma.C., Islamic Azad University, Mashhad, Iran.
5- Neuroscience Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:  
Introduction: The use of brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) to decode imagined speech has significant clinical and assistive potential.
Methods: Twenty-four studies investigated covert speech decoding between 2009 and 2025 using electroencephalography (EEG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), or hybrid EEG–fNIRS systems.
Results: Early research (2009–2012) primarily focused on analyzing phonemes and syllables with EEG, achieving accuracy rates around 75%. From 2013 to 2017, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based phoneme decoding produced highly variable results (40–83%), with more complex multiclass tasks occasionally performing poorly (as low as 26.7%). Since 2018, binary paradigms such as yes/no responses have reached 64–100% accuracy. CNN variants (about 83.4%), AlexNet (90.3%), and LSTM-RNNs (92.5%) demonstrated notable improvements, whereas architectures, like EEGNet and SPDNet often underperformed (24.79–66.93%). In hybrid EEG–fNIRS studies, reported accuracy ranged from approximately 53% with CNN-based decoding to 70.45±19.19% with an RLDA-based decision-level fusion approach, although direct comparisons are limited by differences in tasks, fusion strategies, and validation settings. 
Conclusion: Although deep learning and multimodal systems have potential for enhancing imagined speech decoding, there are still major challenges related to generalization, variability, and robustness.
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Cognitive Neuroscience
Received: 2025/08/7 | Accepted: 2026/01/10 | Published: 2026/03/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Basic and Clinical Neuroscience

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb