Accepted Articles                   Back to the articles list | Back to browse issues page

XML Print

1- Neuroscience Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Educational Philosophy, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Neurobiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Cognitive and Neuroscience Research Center (CNRC), Amiralmomenin Hospital, Tehran Medical Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
5- Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Ethics and Training, Tehran, Iran.
Among all educational methods all around the world, Philosophy for Children (P4C) has been introduced as one of the effective methods, with various educational, cognitive, and emotional advantages for children. This method is built on three types of thinking; critical (logic), caring (ethical), and creative (aesthetic). The focus of this study is to review the various outcomes of applying this strategy in different genders, ages, and socioeconomic statuses from a neuroscience standpoint. It seems that gender and socioeconomic status can affect the results of this educational method just in some measured aspects. However, the combination of gender, age, and socioeconomic status appears to influence P4C outcomes.
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Cognitive Neuroscience
Received: 2023/12/31 | Accepted: 2024/02/14

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:

Send email to the article author

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Basic and Clinical Neuroscience

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb