Khodagholi F, Mousavi M A, Ghaedi Y, Salarvandian S, Vosoughian F, Javadi M, et al . Looking at Philosophy for Children and Its Outcomes Through a Neuroscience Lens. BCN 2025; 16 (3) :551-568
URL:
http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2849-en.html
Fariba Khodagholi1

,
Maryam Alsadat Mousavi *1

,
Yahya Ghaedi2

,
Shakiba Salarvandian3

,
Fatemeh Vosoughian1

,
Mobina Javadi3

,
Fereshteh Khodagholi3

,
Solmaz Khalifeh4

,
Roohollah Karimi5

,
Masoud Seddighfar1

,
Shima Barzin3

,
Leila Dargahi1
1- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience and Cognition, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Educational Philosophy, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Neurobiology Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience and Cognition, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Cognitive and Neuroscience Research Center (CNRC), Amiralmomenin Hospital, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
5- Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Ethics and Training, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:
Introduction: Philosophy for Children (P4C) is one of the most effective teaching methods, having various educational, cognitive, and emotional benefits for children. This method is based on three types of thinking: critical (logic), caring (ethics), and creative (aesthetics). This study aimed to review the various outcomes of applying this strategy in people with different genders, ages, and socioeconomic statuses (SESs) from a neuroscience perspective.
Methods: This is a narrative review study. The related studies were selected for review based on relevance to gender, age, and SES, and findings were categorized to highlight patterns and divergences in outcomes.
Results: Evidence suggests that gender and SES can affect the effectiveness of P4C in certain aspects. However, the interaction between gender, age, and SES seems to shape the overall efficacy of P4C in nuanced ways.
Conclusion: The P4C has shown promising benefits for diverse populations. However, demographic variables such as gender, age, and SES may modulate its impact. Further interdisciplinary research is needed to clarify these interactions and optimize implementation strategies.
Full-Text [PDF 802 kb]
| |
Full-Text (HTML)
● Cognitive/emotional-related outcomes of the P4C might well be influenced by the combination of gender, age, and SES factors.
● Caring thinking and socioemotional characteristics related to the P4C tend to be improved more in girls than in boys.
● The gender-dependent results of the P4C are possibly due to gender differences in the amygdala and prefrontal cortex.
● The SES likely has a greater impact on the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, which are also affected by P4C-related thinking.
Plain Language Summary
Among all educational methods worldwide, philosophy for children (P4C) has been introduced as an effective method with various advantages for children. This study aimed to review the various outcomes of applying this strategy in different genders, ages, and socioeconomic statuses (SESs) from a neuroscience perspective. It seems that gender and SES can affect the results of this educational method in certain ways. However, the combination of sex, age, and SES appears to influence P4C outcomes.
Type of Study:
Review |
Subject:
Cognitive Neuroscience Received: 2023/12/31 | Accepted: 2024/02/14 | Published: 2025/05/1