google-site-verification=NjYuzjcWjJ9sY0pu2JmuCKlQLgHuwYq4L4hXzAk4Res Looking at Philosophy for Children and Its Outcomes Through a Neuroscience Lens - Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
Volume 16, Issue 3 (May & June 2025)                   BCN 2025, 16(3): 551-568 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Khodagholi F, Mousavi M A, Ghaedi Y, Salarvandian S, Vosoughian F, Javadi M, et al . Looking at Philosophy for Children and Its Outcomes Through a Neuroscience Lens. BCN 2025; 16 (3) :551-568
URL: http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-2849-en.html
1- Neuroscience Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience and Cognition, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
2- Department of Educational Philosophy, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.
3- Neurobiology Research Center, Institute of Neuroscience and Cognition, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Cognitive and Neuroscience Research Center (CNRC), Amiralmomenin Hospital, Tehran Medical Sciences Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.
5- Institute for Humanities and Cultural Studies, Ethics and Training, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:  
Introduction: Philosophy for Children (P4C) is one of the most effective teaching methods, having various educational, cognitive, and emotional benefits for children. This method is based on three types of thinking: critical (logic), caring (ethics), and creative (aesthetics). This study aimed to review the various outcomes of applying this strategy in people with different genders, ages, and socioeconomic statuses (SESs) from a neuroscience perspective.
Methods: This is a narrative review study. The related studies were selected for review based on relevance to gender, age, and SES, and findings were categorized to highlight patterns and divergences in outcomes. 
Results: Evidence suggests that gender and SES can affect the effectiveness of P4C in certain aspects. However, the interaction between gender, age, and SES seems to shape the overall efficacy of P4C in nuanced ways.
Conclusion: The P4C has shown promising benefits for diverse populations. However, demographic variables such as gender, age, and SES may modulate its impact. Further interdisciplinary research is needed to clarify these interactions and optimize implementation strategies.
Full-Text [PDF 802 kb]   |   |   Full-Text (HTML)   
Type of Study: Review | Subject: Cognitive Neuroscience
Received: 2023/12/31 | Accepted: 2024/02/14 | Published: 2025/05/1

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Basic and Clinical Neuroscience

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb