دوره 8، شماره 1 - ( January & February 2017 -- 1395 )
جلد 8 شماره 1 صفحات 50-43 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Hashemirad F, Zoghi M, Fitzgerald P B, Jaberzadeh S. Reliability of Motor Evoked Potentials Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: The Effects of Initial Motor Evoked Potentials Removal. BCN 2017; 8 (1) :43-50
URL: http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-697-fa.html
URL: http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-697-fa.html
Reliability of Motor Evoked Potentials Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: The Effects of Initial Motor Evoked Potentials Removal. مجله علوم اعصاب پایه و بالینی. 1395; 8 (1) :43-50
چکیده:
Introduction: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a useful tool for assessment of corticospinal excitability (CSE) changes in both healthy individuals and patients with brain disorders. The usefulness of TMS-elicited motor evoked potentials (MEPs) for the assessment of CSE in a clinical context depends on their intra-and inter-session reliability. This study aimed to evaluate if removal of initial MEPs elicited by using two types of TMS techniques influences the reliability scores and whether this effect is different in blocks with variable number of MEPs.
Methods: Twenty-three healthy participants were recruited in this study. The stimulus intensity was set at 120% of resting motor threshold (RMT) for one group while the stimulus intensity was adjusted to record MEPs up to 1 mV for the other group. Twenty MEPs were recorded at 3 time points on 2 separate days. An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) reliability with absolute agreement and analysis of variance model were used to assess reliability of the MEP amplitudes for blocks with variable number of MEPs.
Results: A decrease in ICC values was observed with removal of 3 or 5 MEPs in both techniques when compared to all MEP responses in any given block. Therefore, removal of the first 3 or 5 MEPs failed to further increase the reliability of MEP responses.
Conclusion: Our findings revealed that a greater number of trials involving averaged MEPs can influence TMS reliability more than removal of the first trials.
نوع مطالعه: Original |
موضوع مقاله:
Clinical Neuroscience
دریافت: 1394/10/12 | پذیرش: 1395/1/28 | انتشار: 1395/10/12
دریافت: 1394/10/12 | پذیرش: 1395/1/28 | انتشار: 1395/10/12
فهرست منابع
1. McBride O, Murphy J, Shevlin M, Gibson Miller J, Hartman TK, Hyland P, et al. Monitoring the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in the general population: An overview of the context, design and conduct of the COVID-19 Psychological Research Consortium (C19PRC) Study. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2020. [DOI:10.31234/osf.io/wxe2n]
2. Maital S, Barzani E. The global economic impact of COVID-19: A summary of research. Samuel Neaman Institute for National Policy Research. 2020.
3. Dawson DL, Golijani-Moghaddam N. COVID-19: Psychological flexibility, coping, mental health, and wellbeing in the UK during the pandemic. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science. 2020;17:126-134. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.07.010] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Li J, Yang Z, Qiu H, Wang Y, Jian L, Ji J, et al. Anxiety and depression among general population in China at the peak of the COVID‐19 epidemic. World Psychiatry. 2020;19:249-250. [DOI:10.1002/wps.20758] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Romero CS, Delgado C, Catalá J, Ferrer C, Errando C, Iftimi A, et al. COVID-19 psychological impact in 3109 healthcare workers in Spain: The PSIMCOV group. Psychological Medicin. (2020). [DOI:10.1017/S0033291720001671] [PMID] [PMCID]
6. Lades LK, Laffan K, Daly M, Delaney L. Daily emotional well‐being during the COVID‐19 pandemic. British Journal of Health Psychology. 2020;25:902-911. [DOI:10.1111/bjhp.12450] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Motta-Zanin G, Gentile E, Parisi A, Spasiano D. A preliminary evaluation of the public risk perception related to the COVID-19 health emergency in Italy. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17:3024. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17093024] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Li L, Lin TT. Examining how dependence on smartphones at work relates to Chinese employees' workplace social capital, job performance, and smartphone addiction. Information Development. 2018;34:489-503. [DOI:10.1177/0266666917721735]
9. Cohen IG, Gostin LO, Weitzner DJ. Digital smartphone tracking for COVID-19: Public health and civil liberties in tension. Jama. 2020;323:2371-2372. [DOI:10.1001/jama.2020.8570] [PMID]
10. Brand M, Wegmann E, Stark R, Müller A, Wölfling K, Robbins TW, et al. The Interaction of Person-Affect-Cognition-Execution (I-PACE) model for addictive behaviors: Update, generalization to addictive behaviors beyond internet-use disorders, and specification of the process character of addictive behaviors. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews. 2019;104:1-10. [DOI:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.06.032] [PMID]
11. Pivetta E, Harkin L, Billieux J, Kanjo E, Kuss DJ. Problematic smartphone use: An empirically validated model. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019;100:105-117. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2019.06.013]
12. Yang J, Fu X, Liao X, Li Y. Association of problematic smartphone use with poor sleep quality, depression, and anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Research. 2020;284:112686. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112686] [PMID]
13. Coco GL, Salerno L, Franchina V, La Tona, A, Di Blasi M, Giordano C. Examining bi-directionality between Fear of Missing Out and problematic smartphone use. A two-wave panel study among adolescents. Addictive Behaviors. 2020;106:106360. [DOI:10.1016/j.addbeh.2020.106360] [PMID]
14. Horwood S, Anglim J. Problematic smartphone usage and subjective and psychological well-being. Computers in Human Behavior. 2019;97:44-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2019.02.028]
15. Census and Statistics Department. Population Census-Summary Results. [pdf]. 2011. [cited 2021 May 24] Available from: http://www.census2011.gov.hk/pdf/summary-results.pdf
16. Chan RC, Xu T, Huang J, Wang Y, Zhao Q, Shum DH, et al. Extending the utility of the Depression Anxiety Stress scale by examining its psychometric properties in Chinese settings. Psychiatry Research. 2012;200:879-883. [DOI:10.1016/j.psychres.2012.06.041] [PMID]
17. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: The GAD-7. Archives of Internal Medicine. 2006;166:1092-1097. [DOI:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092] [PMID]
18. Zeng QZ, He YL, Liu H, Miao JM, Chen JX, Xu HN, et al. Reliability and validity of Chinese version of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) scale in screening anxiety disorders in outpatients from traditional Chinese internal department. Chinese Mental Health Journal. 2013.
19. Kwon M, Kim DJ, Cho H, Yang S. The smartphone addiction scale: Development and validation of a short version for adolescents. PloS One. 2013;8:e83558. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0083558] [PMID] [PMCID]
20. Luk TT, Wang MP, Shen C, Wan A, Chau PH, Oliffe J, et al. Short version of the Smartphone Addiction Scale in Chinese adults: Psychometric properties, sociodemographic, and health behavioral correlates. Journal of Behavioral Addictions. 2018;7:1157-1165. [DOI:10.1556/2006.7.2018.105] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW. Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin. 1988;103:411-423. [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411]
22. Hu LT, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal. 1999;6:1-55. [DOI:10.1080/10705519909540118]
23. Butler TR, Karkhanis AN, Jones SR, Weiner JL. Adolescent social isolation as a model of heightened vulnerability to comorbid alcoholism and anxiety disorders. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research. 2016;40:1202-1214. [DOI:10.1111/acer.13075] [PMID] [PMCID]
24. Lee SA, Jobe MC, Mathis AA. Mental health characteristics associated with dysfunctional coronavirus anxiety. Psychological Medicine. 2020. [DOI:10.1017/S003329172000121X] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Rogers JP, Chesney E, Oliver D, Pollak TA, McGuire P, Fusar-Poli P, et al. Psychiatric and neuropsychiatric presentations associated with severe coronavirus infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis with comparison to the COVID-19 pandemic. The Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:611-627. [DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30203-0]
26. Gao J, Zheng P, Jia Y, Chen H, Mao Y, Chen S, et al. Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak. Plos One. 2020;15:e0231924. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0231924] [PMID] [PMCID]
27. Hossain MT, Ahammed B, Chanda SK, Jahan N, Ela MZ, Islam MN. Social and electronic media exposure and generalized anxiety disorder among people during COVID-19 outbreak in Bangladesh: A preliminary observation. Plos One 2020;15:e0238974. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0238974] [PMID] [PMCID]
28. Rozgonjuk D, Levine JC, Hall BJ, Elhai JD. The association between problematic smartphone use, depression and anxiety symptom severity, and objectively measured smartphone use over one week. Computers in Human Behavior. 2018;87:10-17. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.019]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
