XML English Abstract Print


چکیده:  
Introduction: Organotypic hippocampal brain slices (OHBS) provide an advantageous alternative to in-vivo models to scrutinize traumatic brain injury (TBI). We followed a well-established TBI protocol, but noticed that several factors may influence the results in such a set-up. Here, we describe a structured approach to generate more comparable results and discuss why specific eligibility criteria should be applied.
Methods: We defined necessary checkpoints and developed inclusion and exclusion criteria that take the observed variation in such a model into consideration. Objective measures include the identification and exclusion of pre-damaged slices and outliers. Six steps were outlined.
Results: A six step approach to enhance comparability is proposed and summarized in a flowchart. We applied the suggested measures to data derived from our TBI-experiments examining the impact of three different interventions in 1459 OHBS. Our exemplary results show that through equal requirements set for all slices more precise findings are ensured.
Conclusion: Results in a TBI experiment on OHBS have to be analyzed critically as inhomogenities may occur. In order to ensure more precise findings, a structured approach of comparing the results should be followed. Further research is recommended to confirm and further develop this framework.
نوع مطالعه: Original | موضوع مقاله: Cellular and molecular Neuroscience
دریافت: ۱۳۹۶/۶/۱۶ | پذیرش: ۱۳۹۷/۶/۳۱

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA code

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به Basic and Clinical Neuroscience می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Basic and Clinical Neuroscience

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb