Volume 10, Issue 2 (March & April 2019)                   BCN 2019, 10(2): 137-146 | Back to browse issues page


XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sohrabi A. Age of Acquisition Effect: Evidence From Single-Word Reading and Neural Networks. BCN. 2019; 10 (2) :137-146
URL: http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-505-en.html
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran.
Abstract:  

Introduction: Many studies show that words learned early in life are read more easily than the ones learned later and are less vulnerable to brain damage.
Methods: the first part of the current study, 25 primary school students in the 5th grade read the word groups learned initially during a previous grade. The words used in the experiments were 327 Farsi monosyllable words matched on the other factors involved in Farsi word naming. 
Results: The analysis of covariance (the consistency and frequency as covariates) showed that words learned in earlier grades were read more easily than the ones learned later, showing the known effect of the Age of Acquisition (AoA). In the second part of the study, it was tried to simulate AoA in word naming by a neural network model developed earlier based on connectionist approach. While previous studies used random patterns, in the current study words from primary school books were used. Likewise, words learned early by the model were read better than words learned later. However, there was a failure in replicating previous simulation of AoA in English reading by an algorithm called Quick prop for Farsi. In addition, the model was lesioned by removing some hidden units to see its effect on word reading. As a result, words learned earlier were less vulnerable to damage compared with the ones learned later.
Conclusion: The findings showed that words learned earlier, compared to those learned later, were read better and were less vulnerable to damage. These effects are explained by considering the nature of learning in neural networks trained by error back-propagation.

Type of Study: Original | Subject: Computational Neuroscience
Received: 2014/07/19 | Accepted: 2018/01/23 | Published: 2019/03/1

References
1. Chen, B. G., Zhou, H. X., Dunlap, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favor of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 98(Pt 3), 499–506. [DOI:10.1348/000712606X165484] [PMID] [DOI:10.1348/000712606X165484]
2. Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(1), 85-95. [DOI:10.1080/14640747308400325] [DOI:10.1080/14640747308400325]
3. Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, K., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention & Performance VI (pp. 535-55). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Coltheart, V., Laxon, V. J., & Keating, C. (1988). Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading. British Journal of Psychology, 79(1), 1-12. [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02270.x] [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8295.1988.tb02270.x]
5. Daneshparvar, Z. & Daliri, M. R. (2012). A simulation based study of dorsal cochlear nucleus pyramidal cell firing patterns. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 3(2), 22-31.
6. Ellis, A. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26(3), 1103-23. [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1103] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1103]
7. Ellis, A., & Morrison, C. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 515-23. [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.515] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.515]
8. Fahlman, S. (1989). Fast learning variations on back-propagation: An empirical study. In D. Touretzky, G. Hinton, T. Sejnowski (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1988: Connectionist Models (pp. 38-51). San Mateo: Morgan Kaufman Publishers.
9. Flege, J. E., Yeni-Komshian, G. H., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second-language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(1), 78-104. [DOI:10.1006/jmla.1999.2638] [DOI:10.1006/jmla.1999.2638]
10. Friston, K., & Frith, C. (2015). Active inference, communication and hermeneutics. Cortex, 68(2), 129-43. [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.025] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2015.03.025]
11. Gerhand, S., & Barry, C. (1998). Word frequency effects in oral reading are not merely age-of-acquisition effects in disguise. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24(4), 267-83. [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.267] [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.267]
12. Izura, C. Pérez, M. Agallou, E. Wright, V. Marín, J. Stadthagen, González, H. et al. (2011). Age/order of acquisition effects and the cumulative learning of foreign words: A word training study. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(1), 32-58. [DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.002] [DOI:10.1016/j.jml.2010.09.002]
13. Krafnick, A. J., Flowers, D. L., Napoliello, E. M., & Eden, G. F. (2011). Gray matter volume changes following reading intervention in dyslexic children. NeuroImage, 57(3), 733–41. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.062] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.062]
14. Klingberg, T. (2010). Training and plasticity of working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(7), 317-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2010.05.002]
15. Ludvig, E. A., Sutton, R. S., & Kehoe, E. J. (2012). Evaluating the TD model of classical conditioning. Learning and Behaviour, 40(1), 305–19. [DOI:10.3758/s13420-012-0082-6] [PMID] [DOI:10.3758/s13420-012-0082-6]
16. Markson, L., & Bloom, P. (1997). Evidence against a dedicated system for word learning in children. Nature, 385(3), 813-5. [DOI:10.1038/385813a0] [PMID] [DOI:10.1038/385813a0]
17. McCandliss, B. D., Posner, M. I., & Givon, T. (1997). Brain plasticity in learning visual words. Cognitive Psychology, 33(4), 88-110. [DOI:10.1006/cogp.1997.0661] [DOI:10.1006/cogp.1997.0661]
18. McClelland, J. L., McNaughton, B. L., & O'reilly, R. C. (1995). Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory. Psychological Review, 102(3), 419-57. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.102.3.419]
19. Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). Roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 21(1), 116-53. [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.116] [DOI:10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.116]
20. Rahmati, N., Rostami, R., Zali, M. R., Nowicki, S., & Zare, J. (2014). The effectiveness of neurofeedback on enhancing cognitive process involved in entrepreneurship abilities among primary school students in District No. 3 Tehran. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 5(4), 277-84. [PMID] [PMCID] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Rumelhart, D. E., & Todd, P. M. (1993). Learning and connectionist representations. In D. E. Meyer & S. Kornblum (Eds.), Attention and Performance XIV: Synergies in Experimental Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Cognitive Neuroscience (pp. 3-30). Cambridge: MIT Press.
22. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G.E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart, J. L. McClelland, & PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Volume 1: Foundations (pp. 318-62). Cambridge: MIT Press.
23. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23(3), 383-404. [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90270-6] [DOI:10.1016/S0022-5371(84)90270-6]
24. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96(4), 523-68. [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0033-295X.96.4.523]
25. Sohrabi, A. (1999). [The effects of frequency and consistency factors on visual word recognition among normal and mental retarded primary school students: A developmental cognitive approach (Persian) [MA. thesis]. Tehran: University of Tehran.
26. Sohrabi, A. (2001). A distributed developmental connectionist approach to word naming in normal, dyslexic and mental-retarded readers. Paper presented at The 1st International Conference on Cognitive Sciences; 15 June 2001; Tehran, Iran.
27. Sohrabi, A. (2002). Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: A connectionist approach. Poster presented at 12th Annual Meeting of Canadian Society for Brain, Behavior and Cognitive Sciences; 30 January 2002; Vancouver, Canada. [PMID] [PMID]
28. Sohrabi, A., & West, R. L. (2009). Positive and negative congruency effects in masked priming: A neuro-computational model based on representation, attention, and conflict. Brain Research, 1289, 124–32. [DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.004] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2009.07.004]
29. Soltanzadeh, M. J. & Daliri, M. R. (2014). Evaluation of phase locking and cross correlation methods for estimating the time lag between brain sites: A simulation approach. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience, 5(3), 205-11. [PMID] [PMCID] [PMID] [PMCID]
30. Werker, J. F., & Tees, R. C. (1984). Cross-language speech perception: Evidence for perceptual reorganization during the first year of life. Infant Behavior & Development, 7(1), 49-63. [DOI:10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3] [DOI:10.1016/S0163-6383(84)80022-3]
31. Wilson, M. A., Ellis, A. W., & Burani, C. (2012). Age-of-acquisition affects word naming in Italian only when stress is irregular. Acta Psychologia, 139(3), 417-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.012] [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.12.012]
32. Zevin, J., & Seidenberg, M. (2004). Age-of-acquisition effects in reading aloud: Tests of cumulative frequency and frequency trajectory. Memory and Cognition, 32(1), 31–8. [DOI:10.3758/BF03195818] [PMID] [DOI:10.3758/BF03195818]
33. Zorzi, M., Houghton, G., & Butterworth, B. (1998). Two routes or one in reading aloud? A connectionist dual process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24(2), 1131-61. [DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131] [DOI:10.1037/0096-1523.24.4.1131]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


© 2019 All Rights Reserved | Basic and Clinical Neuroscience

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb