google-site-verification=NjYuzjcWjJ9sY0pu2JmuCKlQLgHuwYq4L4hXzAk4Res A Comprehensive Review of Imagined Speech Decoding in Brain-computer Interfaces: Utilizing Electroencephalography and Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy - Basic and Clinical Neuroscience
دوره 17، شماره 2 - ( 1-1405 )                   جلد 17 شماره 2 صفحات 190-175 | برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها


XML English Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Motaqi M, Moallemi M, Mirani A, Aboutorabi Y, Hatef B. A Comprehensive Review of Imagined Speech Decoding in Brain-computer Interfaces: Utilizing Electroencephalography and Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy. BCN 2026; 17 (2) :175-190
URL: http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3306-fa.html
A Comprehensive Review of Imagined Speech Decoding in Brain-computer Interfaces: Utilizing Electroencephalography and Functional Near-infrared Spectroscopy. مجله علوم اعصاب پایه و بالینی. 1405; 17 (2) :175-190

URL: http://bcn.iums.ac.ir/article-1-3306-fa.html


چکیده:  
Introduction: The use of brain–computer interfaces (BCIs) to decode imagined speech has significant clinical and assistive potential.
Methods: Twenty-four studies investigated covert speech decoding between 2009 and 2025 using electroencephalography (EEG), functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS), or hybrid EEG–fNIRS systems.
Results: Early research (2009–2012) primarily focused on analyzing phonemes and syllables with EEG, achieving accuracy rates around 75%. From 2013 to 2017, convolutional neural network (CNN)-based phoneme decoding produced highly variable results (40–83%), with more complex multiclass tasks occasionally performing poorly (as low as 26.7%). Since 2018, binary paradigms such as yes/no responses have reached 64–100% accuracy. CNN variants (about 83.4%), AlexNet (90.3%), and LSTM-RNNs (92.5%) demonstrated notable improvements, whereas architectures, like EEGNet and SPDNet often underperformed (24.79–66.93%). In hybrid EEG–fNIRS studies, reported accuracy ranged from approximately 53% with CNN-based decoding to 70.45±19.19% with an RLDA-based decision-level fusion approach, although direct comparisons are limited by differences in tasks, fusion strategies, and validation settings. 
Conclusion: Although deep learning and multimodal systems have potential for enhancing imagined speech decoding, there are still major challenges related to generalization, variability, and robustness.
نوع مطالعه: Review | موضوع مقاله: Cognitive Neuroscience
دریافت: 1404/5/16 | پذیرش: 1404/10/20 | انتشار: 1404/12/10

ارسال نظر درباره این مقاله : نام کاربری یا پست الکترونیک شما:
CAPTCHA

بازنشر اطلاعات
Creative Commons License این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است.

کلیه حقوق این وب سایت متعلق به Basic and Clinical Neuroscience می باشد.

طراحی و برنامه نویسی : یکتاوب افزار شرق

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Basic and Clinical Neuroscience

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb